The Private sale loophole.

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by cpttango30, Feb 9, 2012.

  1. cpttango30

    cpttango30 Guest

  2. langenc

    langenc Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Messages:
    704
    Location:
    Montmorency Co, MI
    Why give credence to the 'loophole' title.

    Why not call it gun sales in parking lots?

    Or legal gun sales cause that is what they are?
  3. howlnmad

    howlnmad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    5,354
    Location:
    Harriman, Tn
    Great, another anti-gun windbag that doesn't have a clue. And apparently some experts that don't either. A police grade pistol? An assault rifle modified to use AK bullets? And the most deadly hand gun of all, the Glock 23 with hollow points. The man is an idiot!
    Worst part is, there are other idiots that will listen to this crap. From what I read none of the sales were illegal because they were private. If I sold a firearm to someone knowing they wouldn't pass a background check, that'd be something that I'd have to live with.
  4. cpttango30

    cpttango30 Guest

    I am sorry the one guy was a DOUCHE BAG. If some dude says I can't pass a background check. I am out give me my gun and you can keep your cash. If he refuses I get his plates name and I call the cops.

    That was stupid right there.

    I myself would never sell FTF to an unknown person. I would force the deal through a dealer even paying the Fee out of my cost. That is just me.
  5. cpttango30

    cpttango30 Guest

    Sorry to offend you.
  6. cpttango30

    cpttango30 Guest

    Here is a question.

    Why shouldn't all sales of firearms go through a dealer?

    Really if you are smart enough and want a gun now you go to private sale. It make sense to have a gun that is not yours. Because they will get to the last person that purchased it from a lic dealer will they not? I am sure we are not seeing the whole transaction. Did any of the sellers take a digital photo of the purchasers DL? Did they ask any kind of questions? Or did they get out show the person the gun and take cash on the spot and walk off.

    Why did every single person just run away. Why not stay and talk, explain that by law it is legal to sell a gun this way. There is nothing wrong with the way I conducted the transaction. So what is your problem. Would I be upset if the gun I sold a guy (Which I wouldn't sell to a stranger) was used to murder someone HELL yes I would. I would more than likely blame my self for that murder.

    I love some of the comments though. Someone was saying the more money you have the less guns you would own. WRONG the more money you have the more likely you are to have a collection of firearms.
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 9, 2012
  7. JLA

    JLA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2007
    Messages:
    18,261
    Location:
    Heart Of Texas
    Funny how the ability to 'not like' it is not present next to the 'like' button.

    That dips*** is truly stupid. Furthermore if he thinks regulating private sales will keep the guns out of the hands of a criminal. Criminals are criminals because they disregard the law, so what are they going to care if the law says they cant buy guns privately? theyll buy them anyway, illegally, and not lose a bit of sleep over it.

    All their little anti gun push is gonna do is effect the legal and safe sale between law abiding gun enthusiasts, like myself. Heck some of the best deals Ive ever gotten on guns was thru private sales, and some of them were in parkinglots.

    Tactical assault rifle modified to use AK-47 bullets?? WTF! any ol sks in a tapco stock would fit that description, and the 7.62X39 has been around longer than the weapons its used in. Dont these idiots ever read a book? And the 50 cal powerful enough to drop a helicopter was a Armalite AR-50 with a crappy spraypaint camo job, granted its a 50 cal, and I suppose it could be used with AP ammo, IF one could find some. But still. And the Glock with hollowpoints designed to inflict serious internal damage.. Any handgun can be used with hollowpoints and apparently theyve never seen anything shot, bullets inflict serious internal damage, no matter the design or the composition, thats what they do because thats what they are supposed to do. I get so mad when i read anti gun media nonsense. They dont understand the material they write about and they make the weapons out to be far more evil than they really are... I just wanna scream sometimes.

    Maybe we should ban criminals.. I mean if these people have a criminal record and are considered a threat to society, then why are they walking free in the streets? I mean they have to be caught and convicted to be criminals, so why didnt the system keep them locked away in the first place.. THATS the big failure here.

    In my mind there should be no "severity of crime".. Crime is crime IMO, dont like the punishment, dont do the crime. Yeah getting locked up for life might seem a little harsh for a petty theif, but my point is, if the punishment is that stiff, eventually crimes will stop being committed.. Dont you think?
  8. Claudius Valarium

    Claudius Valarium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2010
    Messages:
    470
    Location:
    So. Central TX, AKA the Middle of Flyover Country
    Does this story really surprise any of us on this forum? After all, it originates from the MSM. Everything I look at is tinted by the source as I'm sure each of you do as well.

    The "tactical assault" being waged is on our 2A rights to own modern sporting rifles (or any other legal firearm).

    The TA on our 2A is being systematically implemented to sway the drones of the country to view firearms as a deadly danger to society, thereby making it acceptable to eliminate them for the good of society.

    I am speaking to the choir here, but make no mistake, this has been visibly going on since the 60's and probably since the 30's in stealth mode. It's just been recently ratcheted up a few notches.
  9. cpttango30

    cpttango30 Guest

    I knew it was to begin with.

    My wife likes MSNBC and set it as the home page on chrome and it follows me everywhere. I just happen to pop open my browser at work and it slapped me in the face with a Smith M&P-15. So I clicked the link.

    I am sure the edit job was done to make all the sellers look bad.
  10. deadin

    deadin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,151
    You also might have to live with Bubba as a cell mate..........

  11. Dennis C

    Dennis C New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2009
    Messages:
    789
    Location:
    South Dakota
    I read the article and want to know what exactly is a police grade pistol?
  12. Double D

    Double D Administrator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    Messages:
    11,037
    Location:
    North Florida
    I would like to say that this type of nonsense is exactly why we pro gunners must stick together more now than ever. Notice they said that the NRA is blocking their legislation. We need the NRA and others, so like my signature line says, its time to put our differences aside and band together. The anti crowd is certainly coming together, we had better do the same.
  13. pinecone70

    pinecone70 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    Messages:
    4,729
    Location:
    Minnesota Gal!
    This is ridiculous. It's a good thing I didn't go into journalism, I wouldn't have been very popular with anyone else in the field. In my limited journalism experience, I was told to do research and get facts, apparently those aren't requirements for writers anymore.
  14. fuzebox40

    fuzebox40 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2010
    Messages:
    1,625
    Location:
    Apple Valley, Ca.
    Ditto.

    Obviously this is simply more anti gun campaigning. As anyone can plainly tell, the tone of this entire report was negative toward guns in general, all the while implying that FTF transactions in someway promote crime or there must be some underlying “bad guy” reason for not buying all your guns from a store. In the end they would simply have us all believe that guns inspire criminality, not criminals.
    On a side note I just have to say that if the government wanted to promote registration of firearms one simple tactic would be to stop being so anal about denying nearly everyone who’s ever been arrested. For example one of my gun collector friends was denied a store purchase because of a drunk driving accident he was involved in some 30 years ago when he was 20yo. For this they want him forever banned from gun ownership and would have him protect his castle and family with a frying pan. Ever hunt coyote with a frying pan?
    Another example, a normal 21yo gal found out her boyfriend was cheating on her. Upset and in tears she blurted out she wanted to run him over with her car. A trouble maker and friend of the cheater reported it and "for her own good" she was detained on a 5150 to "give her time to cool down". Now she cannot pass a bkgnd check. There are many good folks out there who are "not allowed" to register a firearm for reasons unrelated. Of course they wouldn’t think of pulling their heads out of their butt and revise the qualifications to be realistic of its purpose because the real truth is they ultimately wish to ban all, not just some, from possessing firearms.
    A background check should target "high risk" individuals for obvious reasons, and not every rediculouse reason to get around the second amendment.
  15. prof_fate

    prof_fate Former Guest

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    Messages:
    143
    Location:
    Western PA
    The law says sellers that 'sell from their private collection and are not in it for profit' are not dealers and therefore don't need to do the background check on the buyers.

    If that were 100% true then OK, leave the loophole. However I can just about guarantee it's not the case. If you want to sell your glock 21 to a buddy at the gun club and get a kimber then that's what the loophole is for. But how many of these deals are like that? I bet less than 50%.

    As others have stated, if you bought the gun legally and went through the BG check and then hand it off in a non-registered sale, and then it's used in a crime (if not by him, his bad uncle, theif that stole it from him or he sells it FTF again) the lawmen will come knocking on your door. Prove you didn't break the law - who did you sell it to? Yeah, you don't need records of this until you do.

    And god help you if say, that guys kid takes it to school and guns down a friend (by accident or because he's disturbed and emulating columbine) - you'll be sued, you'll be on the news, your life will suck.

    I think fairness is the ideal - if you need a BG check for a new gun, why not a used one? If small business owners have to BG checks that those operating businesses "online" are operating outside the law and unfairly.

    How many innocent folks are on death row? How many is too many? Should it not be the same for gun sales - how many criminals should be allowed to buy guns w/o BG checks? None would be my feeling.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Private Gun Sales Dec 16, 2011
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Private gun sale in Texas? Requirements? Jul 3, 2010
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Senate to Ban Private Gun Sales May 8, 2009
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum The so-called "gun show loophole": other states/private sellers. Apr 7, 2011
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Concealed Carry on private property Nov 3, 2009

Share This Page