The so-called "gun show loophole": other states/private sellers.

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Laufer, Apr 7, 2011.

  1. Laufer

    Laufer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    West TN.
    Having met people who said that they have bought a single sporting rifle from private sellers (not retail tables) in other southern states. The buyers are Not convicted felons, were Not charged with domestic abuse etc.

    Some very experienced gun people have seen ATF guys at the huge Tulsa show, and claim that they are much more interested in people trying to steal AR components, and don't want to bother with an Enfield or Yugo Mauser rifle which could be driven home from TX to AR or FL to AL etc.

    They seem to have little interest in enforcement between private US citizens unless a purchase of a large number of guns is made.

    Yesterday in Tulsa, a hotel employee (who has bought/sold over a thousand guns) stated that the ATF's primary objective
    -regarding shows in the south, southwest, west (let's ignore CA, IL, NJ, NY...)- is that the guns from shows must remain Inside the US.
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2011
  2. WABob

    WABob Former Guest

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    81
    Location:
    WA USA
    I have gone round and round with people in the past about the non-existence of the "gun show loophole". First I ask that they define the word loophole, then I ask them when and why background checks are required. While they usually are able to understand what the definition of loophole is, they know little or nothing about when a background check is required.

    Many people are surprised to hear that the federal government never requires a background check unless it is for a title 2 gun (silencers, machine guns etc.) or it is a transaction between a dealer and an unlicensed person. This requirement for a back ground check is a recent development compared to the history of gun ownership in the USA.

    A dealer is always required to obtain a background check and can only deal from the address on their license or a gun show. A person without an FFL is never required by the feds to obtain a background check when selling or buying a title 1 firearm. So where is the loophole?

    After explaining these simple facts, I still frequently hear the claim that there is a loophole and that it needs to be closed. :( Just can't win sometimes. It is like arguing with a bigot. :)
  3. Laufer

    Laufer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    West TN.
    WABob:
    Are you referring also to private FTF deals at gun shows in Other, nearby states, whereby people often put the gun in the car trunk without worrying about it? This seems to be the main area of concern and some confusion to many of us.

    No matter how the regulations are interpreted, all of the middle-aged guys (very experienced) I've chatted with are surprised/baffled that it is considered illegal, at least in practice, to make a private deal at a gun show Across a state line.

    Even a moderator watching this topic on another website Finally stated that in practice, it is a loophole because a single old bolt-action rifle does not interest the ATF.

    As long as a buyer acquires just one or even two guns, and does Not seem to resemble the types who could be linked to smugglers, then their is no concern in the south/southwestern states with somebody who buys just a bolt-action Mauser, even a semi-auto SKS etc?

    A guy might make a roadtrip someday to/from (in-laws) San Antonio TX via Ft. Worth or Dallas, and want to attend a decent gun show where an unusual selection means a nice classic rifle in the car trunk for the long drive back to TN etc.
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2011
  4. rentalguy1

    rentalguy1 Former Guest

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    884
    Location:
    The mountains of NE TN.
    It's not a loophole. The way the law reads, it is illegal to sell a firearm to a out of state resident. It is illegal to sell a firearm to someone who could not pass the background check and meet the same criteria that a FFL would have to meet. Period. It's a good idea to know a little about the person you are selling a firearm to. It's a even better idea to make all of your firearms transactions go through a FFL.
  5. hunter29180

    hunter29180 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,954
    Location:
    in a motorhome where ever we park!
    background checks can be good..BUT..when i bought a new gun from a dealer andwas cleared in a few minutes then a wk later wanted to buy another from same dealer and was told i had to wait because they could not get cleared?? thats a PITA!! the dealer was 150 mi away from my home at the time! he did call 12 days later to see if i still wanted the gun..was upset because i had left HIM hanging.,.,i reminded him HE said he would call me as soon as i was cleared..needless to say i turned down the gun and never bought from him again

    as far as gun shows..many times i have wanted to buy at one..they always refused because i was not a resident of that state. so i rarely go to any now.
  6. carver

    carver Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    15,049
    Location:
    DAV, Deep in the Pineywoods of East Texas, just we
    I live in TX. I sometimes go to gun shows in LA. In LA if I find a rifle, or shotgun, that I want, no problem. I can not buy a hand gun at that show though, because there is a law that prohibits selling a hand gun across state lines. And yet I have bought hand guns in LA, simply by having a dealer from TX buy the gun from a dealer in LA, and then I buy the gun from the TX dealer. I am 62, and have never had a back ground check run on me for the purchase of any gun, because I don't own any class 2 firearms, the only ones requiring a back ground check. It does not matter to me if you have a felony conviction on your record, I am not required by law to run a back ground check on you, and neither is your local neighborhood dealer. If I have a gun you want, and I am wanting to sell it, it is perfectly leagle to do so. So where's the loop hole? What gets sold through this so-called loop hole, and how is it illegal?

    States like TX, and LA have no waiting period.

    On November 30, 1998, the permanent provisions of the Brady Act went into effect, establishing the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). Under NICS, a dealer may transfer a firearm to a prospective purchaser as soon as he or she passes a background check. If the FBI is unable to complete a background check within three business days, the dealer may complete the transfer by default. 18 U.S.C. ยง 922 (t)(1).

    Since I have already passed several back ground checks, I don't have to wait at all.
  7. redwing carson

    redwing carson Former Guest

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    Messages:
    734
    Location:
    western wyoming
    I need only to show my concealed carry permit. No Brady no checks.:Dgood luck

    RC
  8. Laufer

    Laufer New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2008
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    West TN.
    At gun shows I've only Bought a few guns (WW2-era rifles only), and no more than one per show. I never sell.

    This is the only issue for me, but it helps to see it from the seller's perspective. To repeat, the experienced local gun show salesman was at the Tulsa show and saw the ATF guy hanging around in one place, who wanted to make sure that no AR components were stolen.

    In other words, the ATF guy(s) did Not seem to care whether any buyers drove their cars from another state, in order to buy a rifle and keep it in the car trunk for the return trip.
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2011
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Should I buy a so-called assault rifle now? Dec 16, 2012
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum What's the next so-called 'crisis' from the Manipulator in Charge? May 3, 2009
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum government plant at gun show Jan 4, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum 5 Huge Purchases and 3 New Laws That Show The Government is Planning For Civil Unrest Mar 13, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Feinstein's Dog And Pony Show Feb 27, 2013