US to supply non refundable loans to afghanistan

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by jack404, Dec 5, 2011.

  1. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    $700 million a year paid quarterly to the newest Sharia state in the world who today announced no Christian groups will be allowed in the country

    whats a non refundable loan ?? a gift

    and what have they done for you ? told another islamic nation they'll go to war with the US if they dont get their own way
  2. cycloneman

    cycloneman Well-Known Member

    Dec 16, 2008
    Taxation without representation.

    And this isnt just a matter of taxing.

    This is a matter of printing. The printing press has been pimped out. The press is like a vile sick dirty vajayjay that will not stop.

  3. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    from todays news

    In May, Afghan President Hamid Karzai barred US Treasury Department advisers from working at the country's central bank while negotiations with the International Monetary Fund were underway, the report said, citing Treasury officials.

    "Subsequently, he (Karzai) decided that US government advisors were no longer welcome at DAB (central bank)," it said.

    The US embassy had no plans to try to resume work with the central bank and Treasury officials described the central bank as "hostile" to American advisers, it said.

    Afghan authorities have also held back US efforts to better control the flow of cash through Kabul's airport, with VIP figures allowed to avoid security searches.

    "For example, passengers designated by the Afghan government as VIPs bypass the main security and customs screenings used by all other passengers and instead use a separate facility to enter the secured area of the airport," the report said.

    Afghan officials have no plans to require the VIPs to have their cash scanned in electronic currency counters at the airport, it said.

    Since 2002, the United States has spent more than $A65.48 billion on security and development assistance in Afghanistan.


    so let's get this straight ..

    Afghanistan dont want the US looking at its books but expects over 1/2 a trillion bucks a year from you
    its stated it will side against you in any islamic war and it will slaughter anyone who proselytes anything but islam despite the agreement they would do no such thing only 2 years ago to get aid money ..

    you do know this makes the US look like the second greatest bunch of suckers of all time ( Aussie hold the top awards their for falling for the Ju Liar lines and how we ended up getting so screwed Vaseline is now a requested issue to every taxpayer )
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2011
  4. H-D

    H-D Active Member

    Jun 20, 2011
    Ain't we still got them nukes ?

  5. Songman

    Songman Member

    Jul 25, 2011
    Nashville, TN
    We have more 'taxation without representation' going on in this country to day than what was going on in England prior to the Revolutionary War. They tell us that we vote for them so we are represented. But when they go up there and do things that we are against then they are not really representing us.
  6. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    Jax, Fl.
    We bombed afghanistan because it housed OBL. OBL's dead. The russians were there for 20 years and left with their tails between their legs. We supplied the taliban with all the necessary weapons and money to defeat the russians. Ten years later, we're in the same position the russians were. And where is it going from here?

    Today, it was confirmed that the muslum brotherhood will rule egypt. Duh, like everyone in a position in DC didn't already know that. But instead of taking it to congress, a war ( excuse me..a non-war ) was started in libya at the " order " of the french. And who's taking over that country..yep.

    afganistan is of no use to us at all. But the money will keep going there, and our military will continue being maimed or killed.
  7. whymememe

    whymememe Former Guest

    Oct 29, 2011
    FEMA Region IV
    Well ****, let them pay for their own security.
  8. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    give me 20,000 troops , send the rest home , send the reporters home , throw ammo as needed to us and leave us the hell alone , i'll hand you back a nation that will never ever even whisper a bad thing about the west within 2 years ...

    with lots of room for immigrants .... they raise a weapon , they put it down the last bits forgotten the first part never .. teach em fear , teach em that they are hunted and that there is a greater force than their dumb fake idol.. and its coming for them if they step outta line by a fraction

    cry allah al akbar ?? death sentence right there ...

    lot's of martyrs

    whats left will be educated and polite

    they maybe only goats but so be it ..

    this is war , fight it as such , not this pansy game they have us doing now where we are the only valid targets in that nation and we cant fight back if they drop there weapons and walk away , they walk away , grab em , hang em end of story , dont give em money , give em hell

    where's Black Jack Pershing when ya need him ?
  9. Rhuga

    Rhuga Member

    Oct 25, 2011
    Henderson, Nevada
    Who is going wind up with the money? Filter up, filter down, or just straight into Halliburton's pockets?

    "No questions asked", I have heard this somewhere before...oh yes, The Bail Out!
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2011
  10. gad1111

    gad1111 Member

    Nov 25, 2009
    Swanton, Ohio
    Right on Jack!
  11. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    Jax, Fl.
    Jack, I'm past drafting age. But you can have me as needed. I have never understood why collateral damage is an issue in war. Collateral damage simply means more of our troops will come home dead. Fight fair? Ummm, what? Fight to win!!!
  12. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    look , we spent how many years in VN ?, lost how many good men ? because some twit tied one arm behind the troops back ..

    now they are doing it again

    Cambodia , NO ONE GAVE A RATS ASS, no press, no jane fonda no twit tying arms

    it took 10 years but we won .. and we never had more than 300 in country at any one time ..

    think about it

    groups of 200 .. converging on a village , 2-3 groups if needed , no-one in , no one out

    any one fires withdraw , call out on loud speakers what your intentions are (artillery) and wait , let the civvys leave after they been patted down ( WW2 EUROPE AGAIN it worked there it'll work again)

    do a countdown , go back , one shot fired flatten the place

    they dont let their women out , they are responcible

    do that a few time and the game will change , villagers wont want the fighters there , like cambodia .. they then informed on the khmer rouge every chance they got

    once you make it a us or them situation the paradigm changes , put them on the back foot, block the boarders so if they try to escape to pakistan , kill em , pakistan bitches cut off its aid , still complains all them nukes are in one big bunker , take em off em , for good

    still not happy take em from the 7th century back to the stone age

    this is a war we must win or we encourage the islamist to do it again and again

    its gotta stop here or next it'll be in our homes
  13. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    Jax, Fl.
    There was a certain Lt. that believed the way you do. They brought him home, and crucified him, and hung him out to dry in front of the press. Nothings changed since then, except the faces of those dying.
  14. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    they called me and mine war criminals too for a while , then the facts came out , the killing feilds etc ,

    winners write history , losers decompose
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Fort Drum brass destruction threatens reloading supply Jan 25, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr June 22, 2012 Fat Americans Diminishing World’s Food Supply Jun 22, 2012
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Obama gets gillard ( OZ PM ) to supply IRAN with nuclear material via India Nov 17, 2011
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Further explanation of Supply and Demand, Graphically Presented (why Obama is wrong) Nov 19, 2008