You are a WWII combatant (Any service branch). What would you take to battle, if able to choose?
Hmmm, a 16 inch . . . . If you take it on an S&D mission, X, you might consider taking along a couple of cherries to hump the ammo for ya.Xracer said:Meanwhile, back at the original question.....
I'd take a Mark 7, 16 inch/50 caliber Naval Rifle.
Get within 18 miles of me, and your butt is hamburger!
True, X. For those long hikes in the green, you might have to be content with a lil' ol' 5 in./36.Xracer said:Well......let's see. A 2,700 lb. projectile, and three 150 lb. powder bags.....yeah, I might need just a little help.....
Even better if they were armed with Smeisers, Polish.polishshooter said:But think about it, what if ALL Allied units carried Garands and BRENS?????
And by that logic, the Russian PPSh-41 was just a Mosin Nagant in a "minor caliber" Polish?Why PS? The MP 38 and 40 were just M3s in a MINOR caliber....
Yup, I also heard that the Russians often recycled the Mosin bayonets for roasting marshmellows and weiners as well, Polish.But then again, MANY PPsh's, especially the ones made during late 41 and 42 were actually MADE using barrels from from Mosin Nagant's cut in half.... Talk about recycling....
"Old soldiers never die"this is why polititons dont fight,and send other people off to die
Add good luck to it as well.I normally don't join in esoteric discussions like this…
but I haven't spoke for a while....So… here is my two-cents worth….
In my experience……the weapon doesn't matter…
Only the will to win…..and therefore survive..….
Out…
More specifically, hard candy, Tranter. I've noticed a time or two that chocolate doesn't hold up too well, especially in the warmer climates.Candy.
Tell me about itMore specifically, hard candy, Tranter. I've noticed a time or two that chocolate doesn't hold up too well, especially in the warmer climates.