Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?

Discussion in 'Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers' started by Zigzag2, Feb 25, 2003.

  1. Zigzag2

    Zigzag2 Guest

    agent mango
    Member
    Posts: 10
    (8/31/01 4:42:43 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del All Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Why?
    It is similar to both the 9mm and .45 in shape, but it is somewhere in between in terms of size and kick. So what reason is there for it to be inaccurate?
    "On the bounce and by the numbers!"

    Alphamale
    Senior Chief Moderator Staff
    Posts: 624
    (8/31/01 5:00:39 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Because people need an excuse. The bad groups (patterns?) COULDN'T be THEM!!!! Has to be the gun/round/sites.
    To run from trouble is foolish, to look for it... even more so

    Flhunter
    V.I.P. Member
    Posts: 282
    (8/31/01 5:16:17 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    It mostly has to do with what ALPHA said but some people have tried to make the switch from a single stack .45 to a double stack .40 and find that the grip is too big for their hand to properly hold the gun.




    Guns don't cause crime anymore than flies caues garbage.

    agent mango
    Member
    Posts: 11
    (9/1/01 6:13:48 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Hmmm..

    You would think most .45 enthusiasts must have tried a DC 9mm sometime in their life, and had the same problem. So why balme the .40?

    PS: Is the .40 S&W or the 10mm taller? They are almost identical in diameter.
    "On the bounce and by the numbers!"

    shooter45 us
    *Senior Chief Moderator*
    Posts: 845
    (9/1/01 6:34:08 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Maximum overall length with bullet seated: 40S&W - 1.135"
    10mm - 1.260"

    Dia. is the same .423.

    I have a couple of .40's that shoot very tight groups. Anyone who thinks the .40 S&W round is inaccurate must be shooting a Glock. LOL.

    agent mango
    Member
    Posts: 12
    (9/1/01 11:19:56 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I have two more questions, and thanks for the replies.

    1) Which of the 10mm and .40SW generally has a heavier bullet, and which has more velocity? I have heard 10mm has more energy so that leads me to think that the .40 is heavier, the 10mm faster.

    2) What does minute of angle mean? I have heard the expression all over, but in one fictional book about a character named Bob Lee Swagger, it is described as one inch groups at 100 yards, 2 inch at 200 yards, so on and so forth.
    "On the bounce and by the numbers!"

    Alphamale
    Senior Chief Moderator Staff
    Posts: 626
    (9/2/01 4:55:30 am)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: Why is the .40 S&W thought to be inaccurate?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1) The 10mm and .40 share all bullet weights with the exeption of the 200gr ( I'm purdy sure its 200) for the 10mm. 10mm is faster in almoat all loading than the .40 is.

    2) MOA is roughly 1 inch @ 100yrds

    PS, low blow Sam LOL Saw your toy in the 1911 forum, very nice
    To run from trouble is foolish, to look for it... even more so

    Edited by: Alphamale at: 9/2/01 6:13:14 am

    majormagnum
    Member
    Posts: 2
    (12/15/02 3:13:16 am)
    Reply | Edit | Del 4
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    Edited by: majormagnum at: 1/1/03 11:21:37 pm

    Silver72
    Member
    Posts: 38
    (12/16/02 1:09:29 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del 40mm
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    He who says the 40mm is inaccurate has a bad gun or eyes.

    shooter22
    *TFF Staff*
    Posts: 1743
    (12/16/02 6:00:26 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: 40mm
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I don't trust any factory ammo for accuracy. If you reload, the accuracy statement is completely false. I have reloaded for my 40's and have had great results.

    Hey, Bin Lauden, our women can kick you butt!






    rayra
    V.I.P. Member
    Posts: 416
    (1/2/03 3:55:10 am)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: 40mm
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    probably got the rep becuase most people's exposure to the 40 is in compact / concealed carry / high-recoil weapons.
    Try it in a full-size semi, or locked in a benchrest, you'll very likely find it's accruacy is juuust fine.

    Rich

    anchored
    V.I.P. Member
    Posts: 110
    (1/2/03 12:16:21 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del MOA
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A minute of angle is a measure of distance based on a circle. Where a degree is 1/360 of a circle, a minute is 1/60 of a degree, like seconds on a clock face. If your clock face is 200 yards in diameter, the space between the seconds is about 1 inch.
    If you place yourself at the center of the clock and your target out on the edge, it's 100 yards away. If you draw a line from you to the bullseye and another line from you to your bullet hole that is 1 inch away from the bullseye, the angle between the 2 lines is 1 minute or 60 degrees. If you increase the size of the circle so you're 200 yards away, the angle changes as well - so now if the points are 2 inches away, the angle is one minute.

    Conversely, if you get closer, the angle changes in the other direction.

    {ONE PARTICULAR HARBOUR}{Auction45}{Famous Flying Yen Shop}

    1badmagnum
    Member
    Posts: 28
    (1/4/03 8:30:08 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del cheap ammo
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    most calibers will shoot well with a quality pistol,and quality ammo.you need to find the best grain loads for your firearm.I have tried a number of different bullets in my 9mm,and 114 grain is the most accurate,lower and higher grain bullets give more velocity,but they tend to group much worse.same goes for 40,41,44, and 45.I prefer to load my own,so I have control over the componants I'm using.you never know how long the factory stuff has been laying around.the 40 is a very nice caliber to shoot,just stay away from the elcheapo ammo.

    EvilAudio
    Member
    Posts: 4
    (1/5/03 2:54:55 pm)
    Reply | Edit | Del Re: cheap ammo
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    I just posted about five paragraphs on the .40 S&W and the Spell Checker ate it all. So I may just prove the .40's accuracy by shooting my computer from 100 yards with my SW99.
    Here were the highlights:
    180gr .40 = BAD
    165gr .40 = GOOD
    Winchester 165gr BEB WinClean = REALGOOD
    Winchester 155gr Silvertip HP = GODLIKE (1200fps 500ftlbs)
    Glock .40 pistols = REALBAD (Austrians must have oddshaped hands, cause those grips suck)
    Beretta .40 pistols = BAD (Beretta must be Italian for Dogs#*t)
    SW99 = GREAT (what a grip!)
    S&W Sigma = BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK (great grip too!)
    "If a tie is like kissing your sister, losing is like kissing your grandmother with her teeth out." George Brett
  2. Oneida Steve

    Oneida Steve Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,067
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Welcome to TFF, Colt 1911.
  3. glocknut

    glocknut New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2003
    Messages:
    12,490
    Location:
    THE FORUM MASCOTT...
    HOLY SH*T... we can dreged the Archives now???? :eek::eek::eek::eek::rolleyes:

    mike
    gn
  4. techoca

    techoca New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2008
    Messages:
    329
    GN, you did state a few weeks ago that the forum has been slow.:eek::eek:

    ...and I agree.
  5. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    6,598
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    The 10 mm was introduced first in the mid 1980's. It is a magnum pressure level cartridge. The FBI made it their weapon of choice but found smaller men and woman had a hard time shooting it because the recoil was so great. As a magnum level gun the 10mm's were based on a full sized frame, not the smaller frame size of the 9 mm, which added to the carry problem for FBI agents. At first the FBI went for a downloaded version of the the 10mm then S&W invented a shorter version of the 10 mm (the 40S&W) for them, which could be housed in the smaller frame size of the 9 mm guns.

    The 40 S&W is a shorter, down loaded version of the 10 mm. So it stands to reason that, in every bullet weight, it has the potential to be more powerful (hence higher velocities for the same bullet weight).

    The 40S&W, and the 45ACP have the same level of recoil, for equivalent bullet weights and similar gun weights. That is, less sharp and more of a bigger push compared to the 9 mm. To me the 45ACP is the ideal pistol but if you need a compact gun then the 40S&W can get you similar power in a smaller, lighter gun. The truth be known, for personal defense the magnum level of the 10 mm cartridge is probably too much. But these 10 mm's may make a good hunting gun, or for bear protection in Alaska (but probably nothing less than a 454 Casull should do that task????).

    LDBennett
  6. fyimo

    fyimo New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2009
    Messages:
    187
    Location:
    Arkansas
    To me people either like or hate the 40 SW round and part of it is it's snappy recoil in smaller guns. I have a Sig P226 40 S&W and it's a pleasure to shoot and really accurate. I also have a Sig P239 and it's a much smaller gun and it's very accurate but a real handful to shoot. I think it's a lot of perception to the shooter when they shoot a 40S&W in a small pistol. The P239 for me is very accurate but not a joy to shoot. :)

    My 2 cents worth :D
  7. GMFWoodchuck

    GMFWoodchuck New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
    Messages:
    1,369
    Location:
    Binghamton, NY
    The whole one caliber being better than another caliber is a big joke. I like the 7mm-08. Is it better than the 308? No. I like blue. Is it better than red? No. The whole accuracy question of one caliber vs another is silly too. A 460 weatherby mag is just as accurate as the 22PPC in the hands of the right shooter with the right gun. If you want a 40, go get it.
  8. 40CalJoe

    40CalJoe New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    421
    Location:
    In the middle
    In my hands its not:D
  9. Bushmaster1313

    Bushmaster1313 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    233
    Slow fire I can put 5 .40 S&W rounds into one jagged hole at 7 yards and 5 rounds into a 4 inch circle at 25 yards.

    Where is the inaccuracy?
  10. thomas44

    thomas44 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    577
    The Springfield XD in .40 is very accurate.
  11. clepidus

    clepidus Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2012
    Messages:
    93
    Location:
    Eastern Washington
    I love my XD. It is very accurate and reliable as well. I went with the 5" tactical after having a Sig P239 that I could not shoot accurately. The sig was not comfortable to me where as the XD feels like an extension of my hand when I shoot it. I hear the XD-M is even better.

    In my opinion the fit and feel of the gun is a big part of accuracy. As commented on earlier people going from a single stack .45 to a double stack .40 may not be comfortable with the change.

    I bought my wife a Taurus .357 a while back and she is deadly accurate with it. The grips are way too small for my hand and it is actually painful for me to shoot. I can't hit a can at 25' with 5 shots where she can hit 5 of 5.

    So as often as you hear it, it is not the gun it is the shooter and I think that that is the problem with most .40 S&W inaccuracy issues but that is just my simple minded opinion.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers what are your thoughts on the EAA Witness? Feb 6, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers New to this forum, just thought I would say Hi. With a S&W Jan 21, 2014
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers Thoughts on .223/5.556 Pistols? Jul 2, 2013
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers What are your thoughts on a Colt Defender? May 28, 2013
Centerfire Pistols & Revolvers thoughts on a Taurus Judge Jan 11, 2013

Share This Page