Why liberals love crime and criminals love liberals

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by satellite66, Aug 2, 2008.

  1. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
    Saturday, August 2, 2008
    Why liberals love crime and criminals love liberals

    Crime in America has been climbing steadely over the past century. in the 1940s, there was one murder a week in New York City. That's 52 murders a year. In 1980s, there were 5000 murders a year in New York City. Why is our crime going up? Did we go wrong in raising the next generation? Could it be the images on TV? Secular Humanism? Our schools? The culprit is Liberals.

    For the past fifty years left wing policies have hampered law enforcement efforts to go after and prosecute criminals to the fullest extent, prevented law abiding citizens from defending themselves, while showing mercy and compassion to violent criminals and showing none whatsoever towards their victims. Their bleeding hearts have no compassion for those who are victims of crimes and how they will be affected for the rest of their lives. Why on earth would these sick demented liberals show love for those who take life and ruin our neighborhoods? Aside from being evil and demented, there is an agenda behind the pro crime lobbies in Washington. (Brady campaign, ACLU, Free Mumia, People for the American way, NAMBLA, ETC. )By the way this is how we should refer to all groups that give aid to Death row opponents, gun control activists, people against minimum sentencing for violent crime, people against the right to self defense, people who want criminals acquitted because they are part of a minority group or because their mental or had a miserable child hood or because they're poor ETC. They're pro criminal, they want mercy for criminals and they want their jobs to be easy and their victims defenseless.

    The agenda behind the Pro crime lobby is a totalitarian socialist state. You see crime not only results in loss of life and loss of property and wealth, it contributes to a loss of liberty. We are no longer able to do the things we want and go where we want. In my home state of Maine for example, we have seen a rise in crime because we have been encouraging welfare freeloaders and other have nots to come to our state and loaf off. When robbing Maine taxpayers through government is not able to foot the bill for their checks, they rob them with guns and knives. in East Brewer Maine for example we had a lot of welfare recipients from Boston and New York come in and they have been using their food stamp cards to break into people's houses and apartments stealing what they have worked hard for while doing no work themselves. To us this is robbery and burglary. To a Democrat it is redistribution of wealth. Socialists don't believe in private property so why do you think its no coincidence that property crime is highest when liberals are in power?

    To make matters worse when property rights are not respected, poverty is the result. This is why socialist governments tend to fail. People are not spending their money on things since it is being robbed not only by the government but by criminals so the economy also suffers. To make matters even worse, some residents of Maine are too poor to own bank accounts where they can safely store their money and at times robbers will rob them at check cashing places like the one near the library. This can also take away the incentive to work.

    What is probably the biggest boon to the left is the fear and control they can gain over the masses. Many cities have youth curfews dictating how long those under 18 can stay out late. Many others have even considered curfew for adults as well to control crime. This instead contributes a loss of liberty. Also we are told where we can or cannot go like little children. In high crime areas especially where the pro crime lobbies have disarmed the masses, people look more to the state for dependence giving the government power. Police officers in such areas tend to exhibit corruption as well. In the city of Los Angeles for example, it is illegal for a law abiding citizen to carry around a gun to protect himself. There are also ordinances in place against carrying martial arts weapons and knives longer than three inches. For the Law abiding citizen, he must comply under penalty of losing his liberty and property. For the criminal who lives off of the property of the law abiding citizen, it is an advantage. He doesn't care about being caught, he will go to prison, get free food, free recreation, a sissy and new contacts to help him when he gets out. He can carry long knives, guns, and weapons, he does not fear the law.

    The weak and disadvantaged are the best victims. Rich people live in gated communities with armed guards, they can afford security systems for their homes and live in nice areas far away from the urban jungle. The working poor and those just above the poverty level don't have that advantage. They must depend on the police force. The Los Angeles police department has a long history of being one of the most corrupt law enforcement agencies on the planet. Run a red light at the last second it goes to red from yellow, cross the street the second it goes from flashing to don't walk and so much as toss a cigarette butt on the sidewalk and you could find yourself in the hospital. The police love to target the poor since they have very little legal resources to defend themselves with. They rarely ever protect them as well. The LAPD have learned little since Rodney King. Many times the LAPD take bribes and even recruit gang members. They use their position to rat out other gangs and tip off information to their friends about patrols and busts as they did during the Rampart scandal. It Ain't just the LAPD. Other cities have corrupt law enforcement as well. In Philadelphia, there is a housing project that the police will never go to. If there is a 911 call there the police will not respond. Neither does fire or ambulance. Rumor has it there are dead bodies in that building.

    One reason the police will not go other than that they are lazy is that it is composed of minorities and if they try to attack them they will be branded racist and sued by the ACLU the NAACP and other groups as well as police misconduct. Just recently a Cape cod police officer found that out the hard way. An illegal immigrant who was pulled over rammed the police cruiser and was shot. Despite having a long criminal record he was never deported. When he was shot it didn't take long of border activists and other left wing loonies to come out of the wood work and brand the officer a racist for defending himself. The same can be applied to civilians. It is illegal to fight back. We are taught this from the day we start school. If a bully steals your money, get a teacher. Well that doesn't work, if a burglar breaks into your home, call the police. Of course by the time they arrive it's too late. But don't you dare fight back. Chances are you could be charged with a crime or even sued by the criminal and lose!

    The increase of crime and corruption is constantly blamed by liberals against "Uncaring society," usually republicans. We are told we let them down, we did this to them we were racist this or that even though by the way poor people and minorities make up the biggest victims of crime. Yes. That's right. Senator Diane Feinstein gets to relax in her mansion with expensive bodyguards while somewhere a poor black man and his family are about to be murdered by a couple of 300 pound skin heads who want to cut them up and take everything they have. They cant own guns to protect themselves, cant afford a bodyguard, guess they'd better call 911. The majority of the corrupt politicians in this and other countries are socialists who hold totalitarian power or who cheat the people through rigged elections, nations like Venezuela, Cambodia or Serbia. These nations are supported mostly by the liberals. Those who oppose islamofascism did support the later country but only because it was a lesser of two evils.

    In Judaism there is a saying I believe in the Talmud. It reads that those who are kind to the cruel will be cruel to the kind and that those who are merciful to the merciless will be merciless to the merciful. This rings true in leftist countries and in America. We will not execute mass murderers through lethal injections but we will execute unborn babies by ripping them out of their mother's womb. We will not enforce criminal laws and punish the perps, but we will punish victims especially if they fight back. We ridicule and demonize the virtuous and glorify and worship the immoral. Global warming activists who support mass starvation of children and keeping millions in poverty for the environment, as well as Darwinists advocating the murder and oppression of the weak are hailed as visionaries and thinkers. Those who oppose them are dangerous extremists and narrow minded fanatics. The next time there's a shooting in our schools or malls, don't thank a violent video game or movie, thank a liberal.

    Link
  2. Marlin

    Marlin *TFF Admin Staff Chief Counselor*

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Messages:
    13,852
    Location:
    At SouthernMoss' side forever!
    Hit the NAIL on the Head !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  3. Nighthawk

    Nighthawk New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2006
    Messages:
    3,330
    Location:
    South Central Texas
  4. user

    user Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, We
    Agree Agree Agree.

    Problem is there's a coalition of forces who benefit from such policies.
    Last edited: May 28, 2009
  5. satellite66

    satellite66 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    2,066
    Location:
    Central NJ
    I doubt religion plays a big role in gun control. Liberalism and the coalition of liberal groups do. Liberals don't believe in any religion except liberalism. Perhaps the new religion of enviromentalism is as close as they get to religious beliefs.
  6. user

    user Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, We
    I agree, but then I don't think of the Vatican as a "religion", though it is strongly associated with a long history of pagan cultic worship practices. I think of it as a trans-national nonterritorial empire. But then I wasn't really looking first for causation, I'd really like to have some grasp of the correlation beyond "it looks that way to me".
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2008
  7. ponycar17

    ponycar17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,053
    Location:
    South Carolina
    I think the religious aspects are a bit of a coincidence... What I blame in the disparity of gun control laws between the states is the Labor Union movement. The Democrats support the Unions, and the Unions often encourage their membership to vote Democrat 'so that they can keep their jobs'. After all, those Republicans don't want anyone to work... Umm, yeah... :rolleyes:

    Following the Labor Union's lead, supporters and members vote for the Democrat official. The problem is that Democrats have evolved into an ultra-leftist group where there are few, if any, Conservatives left to be found. The Labor Union voters are voting to preserve their livelihoods, in their minds. Some of them ignore the bad aspects of the Democrat they helped elect, while others take a more bandwagon sports type attitude and learn to like the ideals of the person they voted for... It all goes back to folks feeling a need to put food on the table more than any other ideal they may hold dear. Right-to-work states allow employers to fire employees for any reason, as long as it's not discriminatory. That cramps the Unions' style a bit, and often kills all Union affiliations in those states. Non-right-to-work states, and particularly closed-shop states cause Unions to thrive. In close-shop situations, you MUST be a member of the Union to work on the job. A worker develops a deep connection with the Union and the Democrat candidate that the Union is telling them to vote for...

    I'll end with these three maps...

    Right-to-work states vs. Union States...

    [​IMG]

    2000 Presidential Election Results

    [​IMG]

    2004 Presidential Election Results

    [​IMG]

    The evidence is pretty clear... :eek:
  8. user

    user Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, We
    That looks pretty telling, as to the labor movement and the "Democratic" party. I guess what I'd really like to see is a least-squares multivariate regression analysis to determine which variables are most closely correlated with gun control legislation.
  9. ponycar17

    ponycar17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2005
    Messages:
    5,053
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Well, in that case you would need someone who paid wayyy more attention in statistics class than I... ;)

    In fact, I never took a true statistics class. I had enough Bayesian probability theory in Random Signal Analysis classes to shy me away from that masochistic field of study. :D

    User, I wouldn't call them the "Democratic" party either. I was taught a long time ago that "Democratic" is a form of government and "Democrat" is a political party. The truth is, they don't want everyone's true opinion to be reflected in government, and I will not imply that they do by calling them "Democratic"...
    Last edited: Aug 3, 2008
  10. user

    user Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,016
    Location:
    Northern piedmont of Va. and Middle of Nowhere, We
    yeah, well, y'all'r preachin' to the choir on that one.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr A LOVE for LIBERALS!!! Dec 2, 2004
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Refuting the Lies of Gun-Control Liberals May 28, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Looks like everyone is sick of the liberals. Dec 23, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Things Liberals say. Mar 29, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr "Liberals Panic As They Lose the Gun Narrative" Dec 27, 2012

Share This Page