Will posting comments here put YOU on the government's watch list?

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by Marlin T, Oct 10, 2010.

  1. Marlin T

    Marlin T Well-Known Member

    Jul 8, 2005
    New Mexico
    Will posting comments here put YOU on the government's watch list?
    David Codrea
    October 10th, 2010 1:06 pm ET

    Several developments have occurred in recent days that indicate something as innocuous as visiting pro-gun rights websites that are critical of government Constitutional compliance, and especially participating in comments and forums, can results in heightened law enforcement scrutiny and even as a supporting criteria for "legal" intervention.

    On Friday, I told WarOnGuns readers I was aware of a child welfare case in New Hampshire where one of the criterion for removing a child from its parents was an ostensible membership of the father in what protective services was characterizing as "a militia known as the Oath Keepers."

    Long-time readers know we've discussed Oath Keepers--specifically not a militia group--many times, including attempts by the Department of Homeland Security, the Southern Poverty Law Center, opportunistic politicians, and certain media outlets to conflate them with violent haters. For this, and other reasons, I told WoG readers I was deferring to Rhodes to take the lead on this, and maintaining contact with him behind the scenes.

    He has since issued this report, used as the basis for a WorldNetDaily story by Bob Unruh. It appears the father in question's tie to OathKeepers was that he commented on their forums. A danger, per Rhodes:
    But an even more fundamental point is that regardless of the other allegations, it is utterly unconstitutional for government agencies to list Mr. Irish’s association with Oath Keepers in an affidavit in support of a child abuse order to remove his daughter from his custody. Talk about chilling speech! If this is allowed to continue, it will chill the speech of not just Mr. Irish, but all Oath Keepers and it will serve as the camel under the tent for other associations being considered too risky for parents to dare. Thus, it serves to chill the speech of all of us, in any group we belong to that “officials” may not approve of. Don’t you dare associate with such and such group, or you could be on “the list” and then child protective services might come take your kids.​
    In addition, Rhodes reveals the "Southern Poverty Law Center is now part of DHS," again with further details from WND's Unruh. Again, per Rhodes:
    This is the overt politicization of DHS, to use it against political enemies.​
    Indeed. And now a tangentially-related development has been forwarded to me by a source I am keeping anonymous per request. The Kansas City Regional TEW Inter-Agency Analysis Center has prepared an "Intelligence Brief" for law enforcement based on Mike Vanderboegh's in-development novel, "Absolved." A key quote from the report:
    Vanderboegh’s novella is very similar in nature to a 1978 novella, The Turner Diaries. In The Turner Diaries, an overthrow of the U.S. government and race war was depicted. The novella became, and is still considered, a staple of anti-government, racist rhetoric. Timothy McVeigh was an avid reader of The Turner Diaries and was possibly motivated by its content to conduct his attack on the Oklahoma City Murrah Federal Building.​
    (Note I have also included the report posted as a slide show for those of you who cannot view the linked pdf file.)

    This is straight out of the SPLC/DHS playbook. Anyone with any knowledge of Vanderboegh and his work knows he a committed opponent of racism and a leading voice against the initiation of force, having made the motto "No Fort Sumters" clear to all who frequent his Sipsey Street Irrregulars blog (Mike's initial take on this story is here).

    So what does this have to do with...you? Well, the KCTEW brief links to WarOnGuns and displays illustrations I developed for Mike, including the mock-up "Absolved" cover and the "III fingers" graphic. I have featured "Absolved" chapters on my blog and written a column about it with online chapter links here on Gun Rights Examiner. If you've commented on any of these posts, or done the same at Vanderboegh's or sympathetic blogs, it would appear you're in a very similar situation as the father we discussed above, who's postings on Oath Keepers discussion boards singled him out for special mention in a legal action.

    I wish I could say this seems far-fetched, but remember: We're literally dealing with the mentality that puts giant inflatable pink pig owners on government watch lists (seriously--I'm not making that up). And with mentalities that advocate disarming us if our names make their list.

    And as with much of what the government does, their drawing attention to "Absolved" will probably have the opposite effect of what they'd like via the "unintended consequences" of generating public interest.
  2. MagnumFan

    MagnumFan Former Guest

    Jul 5, 2010

  3. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    they do it here regularly

    i've fought them till they dont have enough money to chase me any more ( but thats sent me near broke too)

    i say speak up , the truth is always worth it
    freedom and security is always worth it
    no matter the price

    maybe not everyone will see it this way , but a few years ago i decided if my freedom was on the line then i guess i'll lose it if it get's the folks i care for free and staying free

    maybe i'm wrong

    so what is the price thats too much to stay free?

    maybe i should ask all those who did not come home from ww1 ww2 Korea VN etc etc etc oh right they paid for our freedom with their very lives

    so i guess there is no limit on price of true freedom
  4. Eddie N

    Eddie N New Member

    Apr 23, 2009
    You hit the nail square on the head, Jack. If not for the brave men and women who fought for it, nobody would be free. As I remember, a certain group of people left England, back in the 1600s, and traveled west just to be free.
    As for me, I would rather die fighting for freedom than live life as a slave.
  5. The_Rifleman

    The_Rifleman Active Member

    Feb 10, 2010
    Might as well add my name to the list.

    When discussing Second Amendment issues, (for obvious reasons;) choosing one's words carefully, is a must.
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2010
  6. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    but why?

    aint you all the home of the brave and the land of the free ? or is that only for Muslims now ?
  7. johnlives4christ

    johnlives4christ Former Guest

    Apr 28, 2008
    its the land of what you say better not be mistaken for a threat and the home of homosexuals and baby murderers
  8. The_Rifleman

    The_Rifleman Active Member

    Feb 10, 2010
    Where is it bad advise in "choosing one's words carefully?"

    It is a logical fallacy to insist I validate the norm; you must provide positives as to why we shall now accept haphazard language.

    Knowing now, the information I have presented above; are you embarrassed in the slightest bit?
  9. NRA_guy

    NRA_guy Member

    May 31, 2010
    One of my favorite children's stories read to me by my mama as a little child was about a man who captured a leprechaun.

    Word was that leprechauns knew where the treasure chest was buried in the forrest.

    So the man wouldn't release the leprechaun until the leprecahaun showed him the tree under which the treasure was buried.

    The man tied a yellow handerchief around the tree and made the leprechaun promise not to mess with the handerkerchief until the man could go get a shovel.

    When the man returned, every tree in the forrest had a yellow handkerchief tied around it.

    What's that got to do with guns and government records?

    Well we all need to give them more data than they can possibly digest.
  10. carver

    carver Moderator Supporting Member

    I am considered to be a domistic terrorist, and gun clinger, by my government, and I am sure that I am on several watch lists.
  11. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010


    me ?

    I aint proclaiming to be free , not even close , but i'm fighting to be , in fact i live in quite a controlled environment , but at least i am state openly to all what i think , what i feel is right and what i feel is wrong despite all the threats intimidation and legal actions taken against me and those like me here

    and i am bloody proud to do so knowing that others who proclaim how free they are but are not as they live in fear of their government and dont speak as though they are free

    but hide and choose their words so not to upset the government or liberal or the thought police or whatever they fear

    fear is the biggest killer of fredom

    fear of reprisal
    fear of government

    fear of all this utter BS that is espoused today

    if you could have been here tonight and see what we discussed , what we planed this very evening you'd cry heratic or something equally weird most likely with that attitude , but we are acting , we are winning , it's costly , but what price freedom?

    we are fighting not just for gun rights but for Christian rights , the right to live free, not just for ourselves but for all in our land who want to be as you think you are

    do i fear my government ? no

    do i fear your government ? no

    do i fear to speak out ? no

    they can do what they wish

    as i do

    i'm still here and still shouting the same thing before they came after me
    embarrassed ?

    only for those who fear , who wish to be PC who wish not to make waves

    but of what i ask?

    not one bit mate

    know why ?

    i'm a free man

    i made myself free by not fearing government but actively fighting them by their own rules and a few i learned along the way

    i've nothing to be embarrassed about as i have never held back here
    i've given 100% of myself to the cause despite that i know one day they'll come for me like they've come for others , maybe shoot me in the back , maybe set me up ,
    do i care ? NO!

    freedom for my fellow man is too important to be choosey on what i say , so i say fact after fact , i say what needs to be said

    should i be embarrassed on that ? should i choose my words so i dont upset the liberal twits who infest this place or should i fight and cajole and rebuke them ?

    should i make arguments that make people question right and wrong ? damn straight i should and do

    should i show facts of what freedom really is or should i choose my words so i live comfortable but leave the fight to my kids or grand kids or great grand children ( non yet but praying for them yet) ?

    No i'll stand for whats right , i'll shout and scream and rant and be embarrassed for those who choose the soft option as its safer, its easier , as it dont cost them anything that way ..

    embarrassed ?? HELL NO

    i hear all this talk about how your the greatest nation on earth , my problem with this is that theres a heap of you saying it , but not many doing anything to make it great and free, most are choosing their words ....

    embarrassed ?? not me mate , but look in the mirror and ask yourself can you do anything for your own nation to make it better or are you living the safe option ...

    then decide who should be embarrassed

    do not take this as a punt at the USA, i've stood by the US more times than i can remember , i pray that you are as great as you claim as i see the USA leading the world out out of the BS hole its currently in

    but thats only gonna happen when people stop choosing words and act , stand up and scream what you believe at the top of your voice and act on those beliefs as your founding fathers showed you

    i wish we had 1/2 of those men here in my country , we would not be in the pile we are in now if it was so...

    until then ask yourself this

    if everyone takes the safe option how long until the liberals and socialists get 100% control .. ??

    not long at all mate , i know i've lived through it here, but i'm still fighting, yeah it's a losing battle as too many are saying shooosh choose your words

    but thats what got this country into the hell hole we are in now

    and i see your on the precipice of the same damn thing and all i hear is shoosh choose your words and not upset the liberals or they'll come for us

    me embarrassed? ha

    look in the mirror and ask if thats the attitude that will pull you out of the steaming pile your in now

    trust me
    it aint

    now i ask you

    are you embarrassed for asking that ? and admitting that the soft option is your choice ?
    Last edited: Oct 11, 2010
  12. The inhibition of the free exercise of political speech is actionable in court. Just need a good case (factually, that is), and plenty of money.
  13. RunningOnMT

    RunningOnMT New Member

    Nov 19, 2008
    Akron, Ohio
    So true John. On another forum I was censured and ultimately banned for making what I thought was a rather vague and benign comment suggesting the demise of certain bureaucrats (no one specifically), might be a good thing. Now i didn't think of this as a threat, but one of the moderators did, and if they did certainly big brother may also.

    Our founding fathers may have spoken of revolution and the need to fertilize the tree of liberty from time to time, but let it not be suggested on a public forum today. i've learned my lesson. Some people just don't get it.
  14. johnlives4christ

    johnlives4christ Former Guest

    Apr 28, 2008
    i was banned on another forum for having a negative opinion of islam.
  15. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010
    sadly , this is getting to be so common its educating people away from that which your founding fathers gave you

    its saying they have the right to limit your free speech because they fear reprisal , or fear upsetting those who would destroy your constitution

    imagine this in the 50's

    someone speaks out against the perils of communism and then is censured because of that because of fear of upsetting the communists

    with this attitude , all of Korea would be communist today
    as would be VN ( well it is but it was the last great hoorah for communism )
    afghanistan would be a highway to the new sea ports for the Soviets and they'd still be around now,

    but people did not fear this , they spoke up , they acted because you do have the right to say what you want , within limits '

    but today you can scream in a public place calling for the destruction of the USA , this is free speech

    you can shift blame for all islams attrocities and blame the west

    this is free speech

    but you cannot state the truth as this is a hate crime or people fear being held for a hate crime

    sedition is now free speech and the truth must not be spoken

    we must choose our words and be polite if we say anything

    its BS
    its brain washing

    its deception at it's best

    and so many just fall into line with it

    because they fear to upset those who would dance at your execution
    who would destroy your constitution

    who would subvert your nation to being one based on 7th century law and line all those up who do not convert or state the party line up against a wall and hack a arm off for the pleasure of a crowd

    its gotta stop folks

    i sometimes wonder what will become of the USA

    what with all the "let's not upset this group or that group by saying a fact"

    maybe the Islamics are right

    maybe they will have total control by 2030

Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum READ BEFORE POSTING Apr 25, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Illinois SB1614 - Internet Posting Removal Act Feb 21, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Don Lemon Gets Owned AGAIN, over Trump’s 2nd Amendment comments Aug 10, 2016
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Waynes' Comments in an email Jan 15, 2013
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum BATFE Taking Comments on a Pending Ammo Ban Dec 25, 2012