FYI:HELP in getting this bad law of Section 658 of Public Law 104-208 repealed.

Discussion in 'The Constitutional & RKBA Forum' started by WAGCEVP, Jul 13, 2003.


    WAGCEVP New Member

    May 25, 2003
    FYI:HELP in getting this bad law of Section 658 of Public Law 104-208 repealed.
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Gary DeCapua
    Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 4:14 AM
    Subject: In support

    In support for your efforts in defending the 2nd Amendment..Its time to say NO MORE infringing.

    From the founding fathers words, "No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above the master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people; that men, acting by virtue of powers may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid."

    We the People (government) of the United States is a Constitutional Republic, the elected representatives are bound by Oath to uphold the Constitution, its principles, its intents, its prohibition of governmental usurpations, its historically intents and the rule of the law.

    Need your HELP in getting this bad law of Section 658 of Public Law 104-208 repealed.

    Thank you

    Gary De Capa

  2. JohnK3

    JohnK3 New Member

    May 5, 2003
    I'd feel a little better about signing it if they proofread it better. That's "interpret" not "interrupt."

    Now, before someone starts painting me with the "spelling Nazi" brush, let me explain:

    When our elected officials start reading a petition like that, they'll see the errors and AUTOMATICALLY DISMISS THE ENTIRE THING. Why? Because it's a convenient excuse to ignore something they don't like. It makes those that wrote it and those that sign it appear as uneducated bumpkins. The anti-gun crowd will jump on that and play it up to the hilt.
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2003

  3. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

    I agree, JohnK3. I did sign it, and included a comment that I agree with the premise of the petition despite its grammatic and structural errors

  4. Gunfyter

    Gunfyter New Member

    Mar 25, 2003
    Western Maryland
    Signed on as #13. Also left a message about the correct spelling.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Congres finally getting something right Sep 28, 2016
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Getting close to Constitutional Law in Oklahoma. Apr 6, 2016
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Getting Social Security? Looks Like bHo Wants Your Guns. Jul 19, 2015
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Getting a CCW in OC, CA Jun 8, 2014
The Constitutional & RKBA Forum Getting guns back Jan 25, 2013