Interesting thoughts - Metcalf

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by armedandsafe, Jul 29, 2003.

  1. armedandsafe

    armedandsafe Guest

    Couldn't decide where this belonged, so I'm sticking it in here, for the time being. If you think it belongs in General or Cons&RKBA, let me know.
    By Geoff Metcalf
    Despite all the ubiquitous picking at nits over why we went to war in Iraq, the reality is there was a compendium of reasons and rationale for effecting regime change and deposing a brutal psychotic genocidal madman.

    A nexus rationale for the preemptive attack was the perception and threat that IF or when Hussein gathered his weapons of mass destruction ‘stuff' together he WOULD use it. IF/WHEN he used it…it would represent a clear and imminent danger to the region and a significant strategic threat to the United States.

    It was the right thing to do regardless of assorted partisan Monday morning quarterbacking and geopolitical gamesmanship.
    However, if Operation Iraqi Freedom was the right thing to do in light of the ‘perception' of a threat…what could/should we do when confronted with an unveiled, significant, direct threat from a known nuclear power controlled by another egomaniacal dictator?

    The chronically saber rattling North Koreans now claim they will start testing nukes.

    North Korea's deputy ambassador to the UN, Han Sung Ruol, said if the US doesn't lighten up on pressure, North Korea would take counter-measures…"for example, a nuclear test."

    This is not a disputed report about ‘maybe' getting some weapons grade nuclear fuel from Africa. This is the real deal…prime time…the sports franchise.

    IF the US doesn't provide a non-aggression promise in return for abandoning Pyongyang's nuclear program, North Korea claims it is prepared to announce it has become the world's 9th nuclear power. Duh!?!?

    So? Regardless of whether or not North Korea ‘announces' their membership in the nuke club; it is already known they ARE nuke capable. The diplomatic blackmail is a paper (albeit nuclear) tiger.
    The conventional wisdom is that they already probably have six to eight nukes or will have by years end. That cheery news means Japan, South Korea, Hawaii and even the continental United States are at risk targets.

    Diplomatic masturbation notwithstanding, US/North Korean relations are dysfunctionally out of control.

    The last thing the Bush administration wants as a prelude to the 2004 elections is being forced to slap down North Korea. Even William Perry, Clinton's former secretary of defense, warned, "The nuclear program underway in North Korea poses an imminent danger of nuclear weapons being detonated in American cities." However, if the administration stalls military action to accommodate perceived political necessity, they run the risk of squandering the benefits of deposing Hussein in Iraq.

    · If we pre-emptively strike North Korea critics will assail the President for being a cowboy or arrogant imperialist.
    · If we DON'T chill Pyongyang's jets we are wimps…tough talk with no guts for action.

    We have already assembled a ten-nation coalition to intercept any suspicious North Korean exports. A State department honcho claims the interception program is "ready to rock and roll…all we need is actionable intelligence." Good luck! Pyongyang claims any effort to impose sanctions or a blockade would be treated as a "declaration of war".

    Excuse me but although few people choose to accept facts already in evidence, WE ARE STILL AT WAR with North Korea and have been despite a protracted ‘time out'.

    Russia and Japan are hinky (and with good reason). Pravda reports, "testing of the civil defense resources has already started in the districts bordering North Korea." Japan is considering a ‘do over' of their post-war pacifist position.

    Again the Bush administration seems conflicted with the appeasers in the State Department equivocating and others bluntly stating, "we will not give in to blackmail".

    When Israel was faced with the prospect of an Iraqi nuclear power plant (thanks to the French) coming on line they determined "that dog won't hunt" (or the Israeli equivalent thereof) and they eliminated the threat with a surgical strike. We diplomatically chastised them with a "tut-tut" and a "wink-wink/nod-nod" ATTABOY. Now it is the Pentagon considering a "surgical strike" for North Korea.

    North Korea has already been labeled the third member of Bush's "axis of evil" (Iraq, Iran, and North Korea).

    North Korea has routinely lied and broken promises on a Clintonesque scale.

    · They kicked out international inspectors
    · They rebuilt a nuclear facility
    · They reprocessed up to 800 spent fuel rods in order to prepare plutonium for nuclear bombs.
    · Consensus is they already have ‘some' nukes
    The administration is between the rock and the hard place and grasping for facts not in evidence. The timing is exacerbated by multiple annoyances.
    · Iraq and Afghanistan are still not resolved.
    · Liberian situation is deteriorating
    · The War on Terrorism continues.
    · US forces are already getting spread thin
    · Politics…both geopolitical and domestic

    Frederick Douglass once observed, "Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress."

    If the White House hopes China, South Korea and Japan can help slow the pace of events they are in for a reality check. Given multiple (and mutually exclusive agendas) the only solution to this classic ‘Catch-22' is going to be LEADERSHIP (and stones).


    The Sierra Times maintains its operation only by our sponsors and our readers. As always, any contribution is desperately needed and always accepted. Thank you.

    Visa, Master Card, and Paypal Contributions accepted

    Copyright 2003 The Sierra Times
  2. 1952Sniper

    1952Sniper New Member

    Aug 22, 2002
    What really gets me is the fact that the Democrats are saying that we went to war in Iraq over a nuclear threat that didn't exist, while totally ignoring the crimes against humanity there.

    Yet, at the same time they want to send troops to Liberia for nothing but a humanitarian crisis.... while totally ignoring the real nuclear threat in North Korea. It's totally ass-backwards.

    I'm even disappointed in the Republicans on North Korea. Everyone wants to avoid the issue as if we're terrified of North Korea. We like kicking butt in countries that are easily defeated. But when it comes to a REAL tough guy, we act like sissies.

    Regardless of the dangers involved with fighting North Korea, it is clear that we must act. The price of not acting will be much higher. Haven't we learned anything from history?

  3. Shizamus

    Shizamus New Member

    Jun 27, 2001
    You're right , it is back-asswards.

    How can we learn anything from history when we
    are constantly revising and rewriting history ? :(
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Charley Reese's final thoughts, interesting Jan 22, 2013
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Interesting thoughts in this column Jan 26, 2012
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Interesting read on socialism, the experiment of "utopia". Dec 24, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Interesting article Nov 9, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr An interesting take on Trump Oct 16, 2016