Less than exceptional results

Discussion in 'The Ammo & Reloading Forum' started by .308 shooter, Sep 19, 2008.

  1. .308 shooter

    .308 shooter Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    101
    Okay.... I just shot my first round with the bullets seated longer to where I hope it's just off the lands. I won't go through all that again, as I've worn that record out already.

    My results were okay, but that's it. My bullet was seated at 2.885" and the groups were less than 1" in most cases, but not always. I varied my powder charges same as my first round with they were seated at 2.81". the 2.81" seating groups were consistently under 1/2" and even 3/8".

    Should I experiment more with different seating depths or just go back to the one I know worked well. Remember, the best accuracy out of my factory rifle without gunsmithing is what I'm going for.

    Thanks,

    Jamey
     
  2. LDBennett

    LDBennett Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    8,343
    Location:
    Hesperia, CA
    308shooter:

    Sometimes touching the lands doesn't work. If you checked the bullet and cse runout as I explained before then you might find out why.

    If you are getting 5 shot groups under 1/2 inch at 100yds with a particular combination (including the bullet NOT on the lands) then stay with that OAL and start changing other things. But if you are really getting 1/2 inch groups I think you have arrived. Load up 50 or so and see if it happens with every reloading session or it was just luck (??).

    LDBennett
     

  3. 312shooter

    312shooter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,325
    Location:
    Las Vegas NV
    Just my two cents but your are exceeding maximum OAL according to my data - 2.810. A master reloader and gunsmith pointed out to me some rounds I tried as you did were not seated well enough allowing gas to escape around the neck/bullet before it seperates, resulting insome very terrible accuracy and pressure. I don't know if others agree but this sounds exactly like what I did a few months ago.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2008
  4. .308 shooter

    .308 shooter Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2008
    Messages:
    101
    Thanks again LD..... you too 312.

    LD: I did check everything as you stated before. I think I will go backwards now down to where I know I was getting great results. Current length is 2.885". I think I'm gong to reduce it by .015" down to my tried and true 2.815".

    I'll let you know how it turns out. Wish me luck!!!!
     
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Ammo & Reloading Forum 45-70 smokeless load Jan 7, 2017
The Ammo & Reloading Forum First 38-55 smokeless reloads Aug 30, 2016
The Ammo & Reloading Forum Purists vs Scientists- An analysis of BP vs Smokeless in Old Iron Aug 12, 2016
The Ammo & Reloading Forum Careless Reloader Had A Bad Day At The Range Apr 6, 2016
The Ammo & Reloading Forum how to deal with a reckless reloader? need advice Mar 23, 2016