PC MADNESS !! must watch people drown or get fired

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by jack404, Jul 4, 2012.

  1. jack404

    jack404 Former Guest

    Jan 11, 2010

    Six Florida lifeguards have lost their jobs for backing a coworker's decision to save a man struggling in the surf but outside their jurisdiction.

    Tomas Lopez , 21, was fired Monday for vacating his lifeguarding zone to save a man drowning in unprotected waters 1,500 feet south of his post on Hallandale Beach, Fla.

    "I knew I broke the rules," said Lopez, who ran past the buoy marking the boundary of his patrol zone to help the man. "I told the manager, I'm fired aren't I?"

    Lopez said he jumped into the water and "I double underhooked him…I was worried about the guy and his health. He was blue."

    Six of Lopez's coworkers said they would have done the same thing. And now, they've been fired too.

    "I can listen to the rule and tell them that I wouldn't help someone who was distressed, but I knew if the incident ever came up I would go," said 19-year-old Brian Ritchie, who was fired today for saying he too would rescue someone outside his patrol zone.

    "What we're basically supposed to do is watch them die," said 16-year-old Zoard Janko, who also backed Lopez's decision.

    A spokesman for Jeff Ellis and Associates, the aquatic safety contractor that fired Lopez, said in a statement that "We have liability issues and can't go out of the protected area."

    "Usually when the municipalities hire someone to [lifeguard], those organizations are not only taking on the responsibility of the job, but a lot of the liability," said Tom Gill, a spokesman for the United States Lifesaving Association. But, he added, "It seems unfortunate that a guard would do what he's trained to do and be fired for it."

    By the time Lopez arrived on the scene, other beachgoers had dragged the unconscious man ashore and started CPR. He is recovering at Aventura Hospital, according to the Sun Sentinel.

    Lopez said he didn't think about the consequences of his instinctive run "until after it was said and done."

    "[We] should have jurisdiction to help someone without worrying about losing our jobs," he said.
  2. mranum

    mranum Member

    Jul 18, 2011
    Central WI
    The wonderful world of zero tolerance. Its just insane.

  3. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    Jax, Fl.
    That was in the paper this morning. All it said about the other lifeguards was, they agreed with what he did. Your post is an update from that. I didn't know they fired the others.

    What your article leaves out is, when he left his post, other lifeguards had already taken over for him so he could leave. I don't know if they had left their own posts to do so, or not.

    If he had been the one to save the persons life, things may have turned out differently.
    But, if a toad had wings, etc..
  4. mogunner

    mogunner Well-Known Member

    Oct 31, 2011
    Eastern Missouri
    He was offered his job back today.
  5. soundguy

    soundguy Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    May 8, 2012
    the city should fire the contractor.. and move all his life guard employees to another contractor.. one that values human life over a %.. furthermore, that contractor should be blocked from doin business in that location for a time to be determined.. hmm.. by the mans family who was saved....... :(
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Madness Oct 11, 2017
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr More Obama/ukraine madness Mar 6, 2014
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr More nanny state madness Aug 22, 2012
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr The Madness of a Lost Society Nov 28, 2010
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr It must be Friday Aug 18, 2017