The Firearms Forum banner

1 - 20 of 48 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,094 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I'm trying pick a recipe for 9mm and .40 S&W. Most of the powder weights listed the Lyman manual (for 9mm) range from about 3gr to about 7gr. The difference between the starting weight and the maximum weight is on the order of 0.5gr to about 1.5gr(some a little more and some a little less). Converting to grams the between the starting and max weights is .03 grams to .09 grams.

The problem I have is the triple beam balance I own is accurate to 0.1 grams. I checked the scale error and repeatability with certified calibration weights and it's pretty good with a weight change of 0.1 gram, but any less is just estimation.

So, do I need a new balance? If so any recommendations?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,094 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
Since posting the first time it occurred to me that maybe the solution would be to set the powder charge using 10 cases instead of just one. That would work like this: weigh 10 empty cases with primers then fill all 10 with powder and re-weigh, subtract the empty weight, record the total powder weight and divide by 10. Then make adjustments as required and repeat.

Would that work?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
626 Posts
That's what I do. I use a beam balance to measure out powder charges when doing a ladder test. Once I determine the charge, I set my Dillon measure to what I want, run 10 loads, do this three times and average the thrown charges. This way I'm right on the money with the powder measure.

But I throw the charges into the pan to weigh them. Throwing charges into primed cases might not work because sometimes a grain of powder can stick in the flash hole, throwing your estimates off.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
41,419 Posts
I don't understand why you need to convert any thing to grams. If your scale does not weigh in grains, throw it out and buy yourself a new one.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,287 Posts
yes, you need a new scale. I always advise a scale specifically for reloading. you do not want conversions to get thrown in the mix and cause an error.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
158 Posts
Any good scale, Lyman, Lee, Rcbs, any dedicated reloading scale. I have a Lee scale because it came with my first reloading kit, and I really like it. It has been a good little scale for me. I use my scale to get my measure set where I want it, and check every
5th charge on the scale.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,287 Posts
It mainly depends on what you want to weigh. If it's just charges, then an RCBS 505 is my choice for smaller beam scales. If you want to weight heavier stuff, then the best balance beam in a reasonable price range is the RCBS 10-10, best all around scale IMO. I mainly use the Rangemaster 750 electronic and have a 505 for back-up. I've also used the Lyman scales and they are very good also. I have used the Lee scales and I didn't care for them, they didn't operate as "smoothly" as others.
If money is no object and you want the Caddy-Lac of scales, Ohaus makes the Dial-O-Grain. I've used one and they can handle any measurement you need for reloading, but they're hard to find and usually $250+.

btw- Ohaus makes all of the RCBS and Lyman scales, they're just rebranded and reloading specific.(grains only, no grams)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,094 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
It mainly depends on what you want to weigh. If it's just charges, then an RCBS 505 is my choice for smaller beam scales. If you want to weight heavier stuff, then the best balance beam in a reasonable price range is the RCBS 10-10, best all around scale IMO. I mainly use the Rangemaster 750 electronic and have a 505 for back-up. I've also used the Lyman scales and they are very good also. I have used the Lee scales and I didn't care for them, they didn't operate as "smoothly" as others.
If money is no object and you want the Caddy-Lac of scales, Ohaus makes the Dial-O-Grain. I've used one and they can handle any measurement you need for reloading, but they're hard to find and usually $250+.

btw- Ohaus makes all of the RCBS and Lyman scales, they're just rebranded and reloading specific.(grains only, no grams)
I have the Ohaus triple beam balance. It has the same capacity and readability as the Dial-O-Gram ie 0.1 gram. Is there another Dial-O-Gram that has better readability?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,066 Posts
I have the RCBS 304 which appears to be the Ohaus Dial-O-Grain (??). Once I bought my Dillon digital scale some 15+ years ago I have NEVER used the RCBS beam scale. It is an unused backup.

Personally, I dislike beam scales. They hunt for the answer, swing back and forth. I've had several and they are all the same. They may be intrinsically more accurate (if you can every get them to stop swinging) but not nearly as handy. To verify my Dillon I have a Lyman weight set. I find the accuracy of the Dillion digital excellent. I have plotted the error over the range I use and it is very small indeed and I don't bother to compensate for it.

There is a fallacy in the reloading process some fall pray to: Weighing every charge and getting every load right on the money. The latest expert thinking (not me!!!) is that for rifle loads getting the load to with in a few tenths of a grain is more than accurate enough as all the other accuracy impactors make that small of an error in powder charges minuscule in its effect on accuracy. For pistol charges, a tenth grain accuracy is easy to obtain and is good enough.

I prefer to use W231 (same powder as HP38 in a different can with a different label according to Hornady who sells both) rather than Bullseye or some of the other really fast pistol powders because it takes a bit more making any errors in charge weight less important.

LDBennett
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,295 Posts
1 gram is 1/28 of an ounce. Therefore 0.1 gram is 1/280 of an ounce.

When 1 grain is 1/437.5 of an ounce, it appears that 0.1 gram is 1.5 grains.

If I am loading 380, with a charge of 3.0, and my scale's "accuracy" is so sloppy that it allows 4.5 grains to read as 3.0, so I am loading a 50% overload, this is a BAD THING.

Or, to look at it another way, the accuracy on ANY reloading scale out there is going to be NO MORE THAN 0.1 GRAIN. Not 0.1 gram, 0.1 grain.

0.1 grain is 0.00648 grams.

You triple-beam is nowhere near precise enough to work as a powder scale. It would be like trying to do laboratory work with a bathroom scale.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,041 Posts
i was wondering about that. Both my sacles are .1grain accuracy. a .1gram accruacy scale just ain't gonna cut it.

even the cheap lee scale is better than that


1 gram is 1/28 of an ounce. Therefore 0.1 gram is 1/280 of an ounce.

When 1 grain is 1/437.5 of an ounce, it appears that 0.1 gram is 1.5 grains.

If I am loading 380, with a charge of 3.0, and my scale's "accuracy" is so sloppy that it allows 4.5 grains to read as 3.0, so I am loading a 50% overload, this is a BAD THING.

Or, to look at it another way, the accuracy on ANY reloading scale out there is going to be NO MORE THAN 0.1 GRAIN. Not 0.1 gram, 0.1 grain.

0.1 grain is 0.00648 grams.

You triple-beam is nowhere near precise enough to work as a powder scale. It would be like trying to do laboratory work with a bathroom scale.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,041 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,287 Posts
"The scale is definitely accurate to +- 3mg or better as claimed in the manual, but like the Gemini 20 it has problems registering very light things. It's just completely off under 10mg, with accuracy increasing up from 10mg to roughly the 25mg mark. Excellent technique and checking with calibration weights is definitely a must when weighing between 10-25mg on this scale."

This review alone should scare you away. Reloading specific scales are made for a very specific reason, stay with what works please.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,094 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
You need to read little more. The scale has a mode function that makes the readout show either grams, grains, or milligrams. It's just an internal conversation. Mass is mass is mass and it does not matter what the units are called. They can be converted from one to the other either internally in the device or manually with a calculator. The readout could be in hogsheads, stones, or pennyweight and they could be converted to grains, grams, or pounds and the mass would still be the same.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,041 Posts
You are COMPLETELY mising thepoint of our warnings.

these scales are not made with handloading in mind.

trickling powder inot a scale that is not setup for that type of sensitivite to percieve the small changes can lead to inacurate loads. I looked at MANY scales befroe deciding i didn't want to risk my head or guns to save 5$ or in some cases.. save nothing.

I bought my small lyman digital scale for the same price as the one you are looking at.

it reads in grains or grams.. and is a REAL reloading scale.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,094 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
"The scale is definitely accurate to +- 3mg or better as claimed in the manual, but like the Gemini 20 it has problems registering very light things. It's just completely off under 10mg, with accuracy increasing up from 10mg to roughly the 25mg mark. Excellent technique and checking with calibration weights is definitely a must when weighing between 10-25mg on this scale."

This review alone should scare you away. Reloading specific scales are made for a very specific reason, stay with what works please.
I read that review and it seems any weight of powder used in reloading will be quite a bit above the 10 milligram range. A 3 grain load (the lightest I can find for 9mm) is 194 milligrams. So the scale should be more than adequate - it it's not I'll send it back.
 
1 - 20 of 48 Posts
Top