Senate Dems Kill Food Stamp Reforms

Discussion in 'The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr' started by raven818, Jun 19, 2012.

  1. raven818

    raven818 Well-Known Member Supporting Member

    Oct 3, 2011
    Jax, Fl.
    June 19, 2012

    The Democratically controlled Senate defeated two farm bill amendments aimed at stemming the ballooning food stamp rolls on Tuesday.

    Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions set his sights on reforming Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps, with four amendments to the farm bill earlier this month.

    Leadership allowed two of the four to come up for a vote. One was to end bonuses to states that increase their food stamp participation, which the Congressional Budget Office estimated would have saved $480 million over 10 years. The other amendment would have restored an asset test to ensure that those on food stamps meet the program’s eligibility requirement, a reform the CBO estimated would have save $11 billion over 10 years.

    Both were defeated with votes of 41-58 and 43-56, respectively. Sen. Claire McCaskill was the only Democrat to vote ‘yes’ for any of the amendments, throwing her support behind the asset test requirement.

    Birmingham News’ Washington Bureau reported that Michigan Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a farm bill co-sponsor with Kansas Republican Sen. Pat Roberts, argued the reforms would “dramatically affect” families and worried that the asset test would render many needy people ineligible.

    In a statement released after the vote, Sessions expressed his disappointment in the measures failures and reiterated his concerns that food stamp spending has increased 100 percent in the last four years and quadrupled since 2001.

    “My amendments would have made two modest but critical reforms to the food stamp program: Preventing states from waiving eligibility requirements, and eliminating bonus pay provided to states for deliberately swelling the rolls. It is stunning that the Democrat majority — at a time when we are borrowing forty cents of every dollar we spend — would object to providing even this small degree of financial accountability,” Sessions said. “It is, however, an encouraging sign of progress that this amendment, unlike last year, did receive bipartisan support and a larger vote total.”

    Food stamp spending represents 80 percent of the current farm bill. Crop insurance, commodities and conservation comprise the remaining 20 percent.

    “Welfare support can, over time, become damaging to both the Treasury and the recipient,” Sessions concluded. “Those administering the program seem determined to place the largest number of people possible on welfare support. Is not a better goal to see how many Americans we can help achieve financial independence?”

    Sessions had initially believed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would not bring his amendments to the floor due to their political sensitively.
  2. FlashBang

    FlashBang Member

    Mar 5, 2012
    They had no choice.. if you take away food stamps people will go hungry and get weak... and then there would be no Democratic voters strong enough to make it to the polls in November.

  3. yetiman

    yetiman Member

    Dec 27, 2011
    Mayfield, KY
    :mad: **gets windex to clean screen tea has been spit on**
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr North Korea: Trump call meeting with entire Senate Apr 24, 2017
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr I Hope The Senate Goes Nuclear On The Democrats! Apr 6, 2017
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Pat Toomey for senate Oct 24, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr OBAMA Will Bypass Senate, Ratify Paris Climate Accord Himself During Trip To China Aug 30, 2016
The Fire For Effect and Totally Politically Incorr Senate Confirms Anti-Gun Dr. Vivek Murthy as Surgeon General Dec 15, 2014