The Firearms Forum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

· Registered
3,584 Posts
Welcome to TFF!

As an owner of an 81 in .30Remington I will have to respectfully disagree
It's not "probably not recommended"'s definitely not recommended.
Loading data is interchangeable but the hardware is not.

There are enough differences in the case dimensions that the cases will not be sized properly. You WILL have headspace issues since the .32Rem, like the little Remington Auto cartridges (.25 and .30Rem) and all rimless bottleneck cartridges, headspaces on the datum line of the shoulder.
You might be able to fudge the shoulder into place and call it partially neck-sizing the brass, but you've also got to resize the case walls too if this is for an 8/81 auto or 14 pump. Otherwise the force needed to chamber the reloaded cartridge will be too much and the action won't cycle properly. If the rifle in question is a bolt-action, then you probably will be able to shove the basically partially neck-sized cartridge into the chamber and close the bolt. That won't happen with an 8/81...not enough oomph.

Dies are tools, a good reloader will use his skills and the tools at hand to perform the tasks.
A good and safe reloader will recognize the differences and obtain the proper tools to do the job correctly. Especially if you're working with a collectible firearm.

Your allusion to the old duffer in Quigley was relating to low-pressure straight-walled black powder cartridges, not a high-pressure rimless bottleneck smokeless cartridge.

I will concede that your use of a .222 sizer to seat bullets in (already resized) .30 carbine brass is very resourceful. But seating the bullets is only one part of the reloading process.
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.