Like you have a L frame 357 and somebody compliments you on that lovely python.
I was at a cowboy match one day, and I was using a third model Russian. Somebody told me that I had a nice looking Schofield.
It's not a Scofield. It doesn't really even look like a Schofield, except that they're both number 3 Smith top breaks. And I thought about correcting him. But I just thanked him.
Over on the cowboy wire a guy mentions that he is picking up a 44 hand ejector second model tomorrow. Somebody else said PIX!
He posted pictures today of an old N frame Smith & Wesson. Someone commented that it was a very nice looking 1917.
I was thinking that, well, while it did have a lanyard ring and it was a fixed sighted N-frame, it had a six and a half inch barrel not a five and a half. There was no big gap at the back of the cylinder because it's not chambered for 45 ACP on clips. And if you look real close at the side of the barrel it says 44 Smith & Wesson special.
So I'm pretty sure that it's the second Model 44 hand ejector that he mentioned.
But he did not correct the guy that called it a 1917. He just thanked him for the compliment.
I was at a cowboy match one day, and I was using a third model Russian. Somebody told me that I had a nice looking Schofield.
It's not a Scofield. It doesn't really even look like a Schofield, except that they're both number 3 Smith top breaks. And I thought about correcting him. But I just thanked him.
Over on the cowboy wire a guy mentions that he is picking up a 44 hand ejector second model tomorrow. Somebody else said PIX!
He posted pictures today of an old N frame Smith & Wesson. Someone commented that it was a very nice looking 1917.
I was thinking that, well, while it did have a lanyard ring and it was a fixed sighted N-frame, it had a six and a half inch barrel not a five and a half. There was no big gap at the back of the cylinder because it's not chambered for 45 ACP on clips. And if you look real close at the side of the barrel it says 44 Smith & Wesson special.
So I'm pretty sure that it's the second Model 44 hand ejector that he mentioned.
But he did not correct the guy that called it a 1917. He just thanked him for the compliment.
